It’s worth taking a look at whether Al Gore is onto something or he is pursuing some some sort of personal agenda. It seems like there’s no shortage of climate change, or anthropogenic climate change skeptics out there who will somehow say reason that climate scientists who promote this idea (and politicians like Al Gore who do) are doing so to save their jobs, for money, for some sort of ego trip, and not for the sake of reporting their findings. I think this sort of skepticism says more about the skeptic and what kind of world they live in than the people they are evaluating. I can’t imagine fabricating in-depth reports and scientific information just to make myself look good or make money. But I suppose there are those out there who do this. Probably mostly those who are criticizing climate scientists and others who are actually doing something about it. I hope everybody continues to learn.

This is a good rundown of the predictions and analysis of An Inconvenient Truth: Is Al Gores An Inconvenient Truth accurate?